<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه اصفهان</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>پژوهش نامه روانشناسی مثبت</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4248</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Role of Attachment Styles, Meaning in Life, and Rumination on Post-Traumatic Growth in Firefighters</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>نقش سبک‌های دلبستگی، معنای زندگی و نشخوار فکری بر رشد پس از سانحۀ آتش‌نشانان</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>24</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">30471</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/ppls.2026.142744.2570</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>فاطمه</FirstName>
					<LastName>رضایی</LastName>
<Affiliation>کارشناس ارشد مشاوره، گروه مشاوره دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>زهراسادات</FirstName>
					<LastName>پورسید اقایی</LastName>
<Affiliation>استادیار، گروه مشاوره، دانشکدۀ علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>11</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the role of attachment styles, meaning in life, and rumination in predicting post-traumatic growth among firefighters. The research method was descriptive-correlational using structural equation modeling. The sample consisted of 200 firefighters from three operational districts of the Tehran Municipality Fire Department, including Operational District One, Operational District Three, and Operational District Six, who were selected through multi-stage random sampling according to inclusion criteria. The study employed questionnaires for organizational trauma, post-traumatic growth, attachment styles, meaning in life, and rumination. Data analysis was performed using Pearson correlation and structural equation modeling. The findings indicated that secure attachment style has a positive and significant effect on post-traumatic growth, while avoidant and ambivalent attachment styles do not have a significant effect on it. Furthermore, meaning in life has a positive and significant relationship with post-traumatic growth, but the effect of rumination on post-traumatic growth, although positive in coefficient, is not statistically significant. Additionally, the final research model concerning the structural relationship of post-traumatic growth based on attachment styles, meaning in life, and rumination among firefighters demonstrates satisfactory fit. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that post-traumatic growth is influenced by attachment styles, meaning in life, and rumination, and these findings can be used to enhance post-traumatic growth among firefighters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;sup&gt;*&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Due to frequent exposure to traumatic events and stressful working conditions, firefighters are at high risk of developing mental disorders. However, some of them show positive psychological changes called post-traumatic growth (PTG) after experiencing these events. Post-traumatic growth refers to the positive reconstruction of beliefs, enhancement of personal strength, and improvement of interpersonal relationships following trauma. Previous research has shown that attachment styles (especially secure attachment) and meaning in life can be important predictors of PTG. Furthermore, rumination as a cognitive process can influence the path of post-traumatic growth or disorder. Despite the importance of these variables, limited studies have been conducted among firefighters. Therefore, the main aim of the present study was to investigate the structural model of post-traumatic growth based on attachment styles, meaning in life, and rumination among firefighters.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Method&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The present study was applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-correlational in terms of method using structural equation modeling. The statistical population included all firefighters working in three operational districts of the Tehran Municipality Fire Department (Districts One, Three, and Six) in 2025. Using multi-stage random sampling based on inclusion criteria (informed consent and obtaining a high score on the Organizational Trauma Questionnaire), 200 individuals were selected as the final sample (102 with a bachelor&#039;s degree, 75 with a master&#039;s degree or higher, 163 married). Research instruments included the Organizational Trauma Questionnaire, Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory, Attachment Styles Questionnaire, Meaning in Life Questionnaire, and Rumination Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling with SPSS 26 and AMOS 24 software. Prior to the main analysis, the assumptions of univariate and multivariate normality, absence of outliers, and lack of multicollinearity were examined and confirmed.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Prior to testing the hypotheses, the statistical assumptions of structural equation modeling were examined. Assessment of skewness (range: -0.76 to 2.73) and kurtosis (range: -0.75 to 11.02) indicated that the data had univariate normal distribution. Mardia&#039;s standardized kurtosis coefficient was 4.621 and the critical ratio was 2.598. Both of the indices were less than 5, confirming the assumption of multivariate normality. Examination of Mahalanobis distance revealed the presence of three multivariate outliers, which were removed from the final analysis. Furthermore, the tolerance index (Tolerance &gt; 0.1) and variance inflation factor (VIF &lt; 5) indicated the absence of multicollinearity among the research variables.&lt;br /&gt;The results of the Pearson correlation matrix are presented in Table 1. As can be observed, post-traumatic growth has a positive and significant relationship with secure attachment style and meaning in life. In other words, an increase in secure attachment style and meaning in life is associated with an increase in post-traumatic growth among firefighters. Moreover, post-traumatic growth showed a negative and significant relationship with rumination. Among insecure attachment styles, both avoidant and ambivalent attachment styles also had a positive and significant relationship with post-traumatic growth.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Table 1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Correlation Matrix Between Research Variables&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Variable&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1-Secure attachment style&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2-Avoidant attachment style&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.268**&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3-Ambivalent attachment style&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.444**&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.666**&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4- Rumination&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-0.483**&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-0.060&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-0.070&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5- Meaning in life&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.193**&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.130&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.405**&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-0.120&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;6-Post-traumatic growth&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.563**&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.387**&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.402**&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-0.279**&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.344**&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;**. *p* &lt; 0.01 (two-tailed)&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;To evaluate the fit of the proposed structural model, various fit indices were used. The results presented in Table 2 indicate that the final research model has a satisfactory fit. The relative chi-square value (CMIN/DF) was 2.20, which is less than 3, indicating a good model fit. The comparative fit indices, including CFI (0.978), IFI (0.978), and GFI (0.964), were all greater than 0.9, suggesting a very good model fit. Furthermore, the RMSEA value was 0.069 (with a 90% confidence interval: 0.05 to 0.07), which is less than 0.08, indicating an acceptable model fit. The PNFI (0.619) and PCFI (0.629) indices were also greater than 0.5, indicating a good model fit in terms of parsimony.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Table 2&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Appropriateness Indices of the Proposed Research Model&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fit Index&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;χ²&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;df&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;P-value&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CMIN/df&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;RMSEA (90% CI)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PNFI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CFI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PCFI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;IFI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;GFI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Modified value&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;130.155&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;59&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;0.001&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2.20&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.069 (0.05-0.07)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.619&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.978&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.629&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.978&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.964&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*Acceptable index values: PNFI, PCFI &gt; 0.5; CFI, GFI, IFI &gt; 0.9; RMSEA &lt; 0.08; CMIN/DF &lt; 3 (good), &lt; 5 (acceptable) (Kline, 2023)*&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After confirming the model fit, the standardized coefficients of the direct paths were examined. The results are presented in Table 3.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Table 3&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Standardized Coefficients of the Proposed Research Model&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Path&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Standardized Coefficient (β)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Standard Error&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Critical Ratio&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;P-value&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Secure attachment style → Post-traumatic growth&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.414&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.038&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3.604&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;0.001&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Avoidant attachment style → Post-traumatic growth&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-0.199&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.009&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-1.795&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.073&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ambivalent attachment style → Post-traumatic growth&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-0.069&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.007&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-0.800&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.424&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meaning in life → Post-traumatic growth&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.278&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.023&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3.138&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.002&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rumination → Post-traumatic growth&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.076&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.017&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.820&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;0.401&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Based on the results presented in Table 3, secure attachment style had a positive and significant effect on post-traumatic growth (β = 0.414, p &lt; 0.001), while avoidant (β = -0.199, p = 0.073) and ambivalent (β = -0.069, p = 0.424) attachment styles did not show a significant effect on growth. Furthermore, meaning in life had a positive and significant relationship with post-traumatic growth (β = 0.278, p = 0.002), but the effect of rumination on growth, although positive in coefficient, was not statistically significant (β = 0.076, p = 0.401). These results indicate that secure attachment style and meaning in life are effective factors in promoting post-traumatic growth among firefighters.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Based on the findings of this study, secure attachment style and meaning in life are two main and effective factors in predicting post-traumatic growth among firefighters. These results are consistent with the findings of previous studies (e.g., Han et al., 2023; Zafartaleb &amp; Taklavi, 2023). Firefighters with secure attachment, due to having an internal secure base and adaptive coping strategies, have a greater ability to transform traumatic experiences into growth opportunities. Furthermore, the presence of meaning in life helps them to redefine the suffering caused by occupational incidents and achieve positive cognitive reconstruction. The non-significance of rumination in the final model may be due to the complex nature of this construct or the moderating role of other variables. Limitations of the study include the cross-sectional design and the impossibility of causal inference, the sole reliance on self-report measures, and the sample being limited to male firefighters. It is suggested that future longitudinal studies be conducted with more diverse samples in terms of gender and using multiple assessment methods.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ethical Considerations&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Compliance with Ethical Guidelines&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This study was approved by the Islamic Azad University Research Ethics Committee (ethics code: IR.IAU.TNB.REC.1403.051). All ethical principles including informed written consent, confidentiality, anonymity of responses, and the right to withdraw were observed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Authors&#039; Contributions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First author: Study design, data collection, statistical analysis, drafting and writing of the manuscript. &lt;br /&gt;Corresponding author (Second author): Supervision, conceptualization, methodology development, critical revision of the manuscript, editing and addressing reviewers&#039; comments, final approval for submission, and handling of the peer review process.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conflict of Interest&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Funding&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Acknowledgment&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The authors thank all firefighters who participated in this study, as well as the officials of the Tehran Fire Department for their cooperation.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;*. Corresponding author</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی نقش سبک‌های دلبستگی، معنای زندگی و نشخوار فکری در پیش‌بینی رشد پس از سانحه در میان آتش‌نشانان انجام شد. روش پژوهش توصیفی-همبستگی با استفاده از معادلات ساختاری بود. نمونۀ پژوهش شامل 200 نفر از آتش­نشانان در سه منطقۀ عملیاتی آتش­نشانی شهرداری تهران شامل منطقۀ یک عملیاتی، منطقۀ سه عملیاتی و منطقۀ شش عملیاتی بود که به صورت تصادفی چندمرحله­ای و با توجه به ملاک­های ورود انتخاب شدند. در این پژوهش از پرسشنامه‌های ترومای سازمانی، رشد پس از سانحه، سبک­های دلبستگی، معنای زندگی و نشخوار فکری استفاده شد. تحلیل آماری داده­ها با استفاده از همبستگی پیرسون و مدل­یابی معادلات ساختاری انجام شد. یافته­های پژوهش نشان داد سبک دلبستگی ایمن تأثیری مثبت و معنادار بر رشد پس از سانحه دارد، در حالی‌ که سبک‌های دلبستگی اجتنابی و دوسوگرا تأثیری معنادار بر رشد پس از سانحه ندارند. همچنین، معنای زندگی با رشد پس از سانحه رابطه‌ای مثبت و معنادار دارد، اما اثر نشخوار فکری بر رشد پس از سانحه، با وجود مثبت‌بودن ضریب، از نظر آماری معنادار نیست. افزون بر این، مدل نهایی پژوهش مبنی بر رابطۀ ساختاری رشد پس از سانحه بر اساس سبک­های دلبستگی، معنای زندگی و نشخوار فکری در میان آتش‌نشانان از برازش مطلوب برخوردار است. بر اساس نتایج این پژوهش، می­توان نتیجه گرفت رشد پس از سانحه متأثر از سبک­های دلبستگی، معنای زندگی و نشخوار فکری است و از این یافته­ها می­توان در راستای بالابردن رشد پس از سانحۀ آتش­نشانان استفاده کرد.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">رشد پس از سانحه</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">سبک­های دلبستگی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">معنای زندگی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">نشخوار فکری</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ppls.ui.ac.ir/article_30471_6d6dc909ded8540af653cb8c69bcd9e6.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه اصفهان</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>پژوهش نامه روانشناسی مثبت</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4248</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Psychological Analysis of Parvin Etesami’s Poetry from a Positive Psychology Perspective Based on the Six Virtues of Positive Psychology</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>تحلیل روان‌شناختی اشعار پروین اعتصامی با رویکرد روان‌شناسی مثبت (بر اساس 6 فضیلت روان‌شناسی مثبت)</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>25</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>44</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">30525</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/ppls.2026.147447.2686</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>کامران</FirstName>
					<LastName>شیوندی</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشیار، گروه روان‌شناسی تربیتی، دانشکدۀ روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>زهرا</FirstName>
					<LastName>وحیدنیا</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشجوی دکتری، گروه روان‌شناسی تربیتی، دانشکدۀ روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Interdisciplinary studies characterize the contemporary scientific world. Besides, adopting a psychological perspective on major literary works can deepen understanding of these texts while providing opportunities to apply insights from such works to convey psychological concepts. Parvin Etesami, a prominent contemporary poet, imparts ethical teachings and guidance for human well-being through various poetic forms, narratives, and allegories. This qualitative study was conducted using a deductive thematic analysis approach, aiming to examine the relationship between the themes in Etesami’s poetry and the virtues of positive psychology. The population of this study included the entire Divan of Parvin Etesami, which was analyzed using a census method. The unit of analysis was the couplet. The findings indicated that the themes in Etesami’s poems align with the principles of positive psychology. The most frequently recurring themes were those related to the virtue of wisdom, among which “love of learning” appeared prominent. Following this, the most common themes pertained to the virtue of temperance, with Etesami placing strong emphasis on self-regulation and the control of desires, as well as recommending prudence and foresight. Findings beyond Seligman&#039;s model are also evident in Parvin Etesami&#039;s poetry: the value of art, seizing opportunities, avoiding bad companions, and endurance, indicating that Parvin had a deeper perspective on human virtues. The application of these concepts, alongside the virtues and strengths highlighted by positive psychology specialists, can transform Parvin&#039;s teachings into a valuable resource for completing and enriching the teaching of moral virtues in positive psychology.
&lt;strong&gt;Introduction&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;sup&gt;*&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
Literature offers valuable insights into individuals and societies, making interdisciplinary studies between literature and psychology significant. Positive psychology identifies virtues and character strengths that foster well-being and flourishing (Carr, 2004). Peterson and Seligman (2004) outlined six universal virtues: wisdom, courage, humanity, justice, temperance, and transcendence. Parvin Etesami’s poetry features numerous moral and educational themes related to these virtues. This study aims to examine how the six virtues identified in positive psychology are represented in the poetry of Parvin Etesami, to determine the relative frequency of these virtues and the factors contributing to their prominence, and to identify the character strengths associated with each virtue, as well as the mechanisms through which they are cultivated in her poetic teachings.
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Method&lt;/strong&gt;
This qualitative study employs deductive thematic analysis, with codes selected based on a predetermined theory. The theoretical framework is grounded in the six virtues of positive psychology as classified by Peterson and Seligman (2004). The research corpus comprises the entire Divan of Parvin Etesami, published during the poet&#039;s lifetime with an introduction by Malek osh-Sho&#039;ara Bahar, consisting of 5,600 couplets in the forms of odes, masnavis, and fragments. The sampling method was a census, and the unit of analysis was the couplet. The research was conducted following the phases outlined by Clarke and Braun (2006). Initially, the researcher conducted repeated readings of the poems and related works on Parvin Etesami to become familiar with the poet&#039;s mindset and the depth and richness of the text. Subsequently, each couplet was assigned to concepts derived from positive psychology virtues based on its theme, and coding was performed manually via note-taking. To ensure the reliability of the results, the entire corpus was re-examined and coded using MAXQDA 2022 software, and basic themes were extracted. Basic themes were then merged, repetitive themes were removed, and themes belonging to each virtue were grouped, resulting in organizing themes. To assess validity, the opinions and guidance of three professors of Persian Language and Literature from Tarbiat Modares University and Allameh Tabataba&#039;i University in Tehran were utilized. Reliability was assessed using a single-coder method with two rounds of coding (manual and computer-assisted). Holsti&#039;s coefficient was calculated, yielding 0.79.
 
&lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt;
The findings reveal a substantial alignment between the teachings of Parvin Etesami and the six core virtues identified in Peterson and Seligman’s Classification of Character Strengths and Virtues (2004): Wisdom, Courage, Humanity, Justice, Temperance, and Transcendence. In response to the first research question, a systematic examination of Parvin E&#039;tesami’s poetry demonstrates that all six virtues are represented throughout her Divan. Wisdom is reflected in themes such as the importance of knowledge, love of learning, criticism of ignorance, advocacy of women’s education, reliance on rational judgment, avoidance of actionless speech, and perspective. Courage appears through themes related to speaking the truth, perseverance, and sustained effort. Humanity is represented through friendship, kindness, and helping vulnerable individuals. Justice is reflected in themes of wise leadership and criticism of social injustice. Temperance emerges through prudence, self-regulation, control of desires, humility, and avoidance of selfishness. Transcendence is represented through purity, integrity, spirituality, remembrance of God, and seeking divine assistance. In addition to these six virtues, several themes extending beyond Seligman&#039;s model are identified: appreciation of art, valuing opportunities, avoiding bad companions, and practicing patience. These themes suggest a broader and deeper perspective on human excellence in Parvin Etesami’s poetry.
Regarding the second research question, line-by-line coding of the Divan indicates that Wisdom is the most frequently recurring virtue. Among its associated character strengths, Love of Learning receives the greatest emphasis. Temperance ranks second in frequency, with particular attention given to self-regulation and control of desires, followed by prudence and future-oriented thinking. The prominence of these two virtues reflects Parvin E&#039;tesami’s concern with education, particularly for women, as well as her emphasis on moderation and self-discipline as essential foundations of moral development. The remaining virtues, including Humanity, Courage, Justice, and Transcendence, appear with lower frequencies.
In response to the third research question, the findings indicate specific mechanisms by which each virtue can be cultivated. Wisdom and Knowledge are attained through curiosity, love of learning, and deep contemplation directed towards discovering truth. A wise individual avoids actionless speech and follows reason rather than personal desires. Courage is primarily achieved through persistent effort and perseverance despite obstacles. Individuals with courage speak the truth without fear, even in difficult circumstances. Humanity is cultivated through kindness, empathy, and assistance to disadvantaged individuals. Justice is promoted through awareness of social injustice and acceptance of wise leadership, often symbolized by metaphors such as a captain guiding a ship. Temperance is achieved through self-regulation, prudence, future-oriented thinking, and humility. Transcendence is cultivated through spirituality, trust in God, and reliance on divine guidance. These virtues are conveyed through simple language, stories, allegories, and vivid metaphors that make moral teachings understandable and accessible to a wide audience.
 
&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;
This study examined the representation of positive psychology virtues in the poetry of Parvin Etesami using Peterson and Seligman’s Classification of Character Strengths and Virtues (2004). The findings indicate that the major virtues proposed in positive psychology are reflected in Parvin E&#039;tesami’s poems. Among these virtues, Wisdom and Temperance receive the greatest emphasis, highlighting the poet’s commitment to education, self-discipline, rational thinking, and moral development. The frequent emphasis on learning, particularly women’s education, reflects her awareness of the social and cultural challenges of her time and her efforts to promote intellectual and ethical growth through literature.
The findings also suggest that Parvin Etesami’s conception of virtue extends beyond Seligman&#039;s model. Themes such as appreciation of art, valuing opportunities, avoiding harmful companionships, and practicing patience reveal additional dimensions of human excellence not explicitly emphasized in positive psychology models. These findings support the view that classical Persian literature can contribute valuable insights to contemporary theories of character and virtue.
Parvin Etesami not only describes virtues but also offers practical pathways for cultivating them through simple language, narratives, allegories, and vivid metaphors, making her poetry particularly suitable for moral and character education.
Despite these contributions, the study was limited to analyzing a single poet’s works. Future research may compare positive psychology virtues across different Persian poets and literary traditions. The findings also suggest that Parvin Etesami’s poetry can serve as a valuable resource for culturally grounded educational programs promoting character strengths, moral development, and psychological well-being.
 
&lt;strong&gt;Ethical Consideration:&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Compliance with Ethical Guidelines:&lt;/strong&gt; This research adheres to the fundamental ethical guidelines for literary and textual studies, including the avoidance of plagiarism, accurate representation of the original text, and respect for intellectual property rights.
&lt;strong&gt;Authors&#039; Contributions:&lt;/strong&gt; Both authors contributed equally to all stages of this research, including study design, data collection and analysis, interpretation of findings, manuscript writing, and final approval of the version to be published.
&lt;strong&gt;Conflict of Interest:&lt;/strong&gt; The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
&lt;strong&gt;Funding:&lt;/strong&gt; This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
&lt;strong&gt;Acknowledgement:&lt;/strong&gt; The authors thank three professors of Persian language and literature for their valuable guidance and for validating the themes.
 
 
 
 
*. Corresponding author</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">دنیای علم امروز دنیای مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای است. نگاهی روان‌شناسانه به آثار ادبی بزرگ به فهم عمیق‌تر این آثار کمک می‌کند. پروین اعتصامی یکی از شاعران معاصر است که در قالب انواع شعر و داستان و تمثیل سعی می‌کند آموزه‌های اخلاقی و توصیه‌هایی برای سعادت انسان ارائه دهد. این پژوهش با رویکردی کیفی و از نوع تحلیل مضمون قیاسی انجام شده‌ است و هدف آن این است که مضامین منتخب اشعار پروین اعتصامی را از دیدگاه بازنمایی فضیلت‌های روان‌شناسی مثبت بررسی کند. جامعۀ این پژوهش کل اشعار دیوان پروین اعتصامی است که به روش تمام‌شماری بررسی شده‌اند و واحد تحلیل در این پژوهش بیت بوده است. یافته‌ها نشان داد مضامین اشعار پروین اعتصامی هم‌راستا با روان‌شناسی مثبت است و بیشترین مضمون تکرارشونده در اشعار پروین اعتصامی، مضامین زیرمجموعۀ خردمندی است و از میان توانمندی‌های خردمندی، بیشترین تأکید بر عشق به یادگیری بوده ‌است. پس از آن، بیشترین مضمون تکرارشونده، توانمندی‌های زیرمجموعۀ اعتدال است که از این میان، پروین اعتصامی بیشترین تأکید را بر خودنظم‌بخشی و کنترل هوی و هوس داشته ‌است و در ادامه، احتیاط و آینده‌نگری را توصیه کرده ‌است. مضامین فراتر از مدل سلیگمن نیز در اشعار پروین اعتصامی، از جمله ارزش هنر، فرصت را غنیمت‌شمردن، همنشین بد و بردباری، نشان می‌دهند پروین نگاهی عمیق‌تر به فضایل انسانی دارد. به‌کارگیری این مفاهیم علاوه بر نکات و فضایلی که متخصصان روان‌شناسی مثبت اشاره کرده‌اند، می‌تواند آموزه‌های پروین را به منبعی ارزشمند برای تکمیل و غنی‌سازی آموزش فضایل اخلاقی در روان‌شناسی مثبت‌ تبدیل کند.
 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">روان‌شناسی مثبت</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">پروین اعتصامی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">فضیلت</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">خردمندی</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ppls.ui.ac.ir/article_30525_2bda8f04f96c7d220f60e8983aa1b30e.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه اصفهان</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>پژوهش نامه روانشناسی مثبت</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4248</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Effect of Cognitive-Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy on Mental Pain and Forgiveness in Women with Depression, Who Experienced a Romantic Relationship Breakup</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>اثربخشی روان‌درمانی تحلیل شناختی-رفتاری بر درد ذهنی و بخشش زنان دچار افسردگی هم‌بود با شکست عاطفی</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>45</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>64</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">30472</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/ppls.2026.147767.2694</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>نجمه</FirstName>
					<LastName>حمید</LastName>
<Affiliation>استاد، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکدۀ علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>بهناز</FirstName>
					<LastName>ارتضایی</LastName>
<Affiliation>دکتری روانشناسی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکدۀ علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>عبدالکاظم</FirstName>
					<LastName>نیسی</LastName>
<Affiliation>استاد، گروه روانشناسی ب، دانشکدۀ علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>ایران</FirstName>
					<LastName>داودی</LastName>
<Affiliation>استادیار، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکدۀ علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>13</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of cognitive behavioral analysis psychotherapy on subjective pain and forgiveness in women with depression who had experienced romantic relationship breakup. In this study, a semi-experimental, pre-test-post-test design with a control group with a three-month follow-up was employed. The target population for this study consisted of women aged 18 to 35 years in Isfahan during 1400 in the Iranian calendar (2021–2022) who had experienced a romantic relationship breakup and were experiencing depression. A total of 30 participants were selected through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to either the experimental group or the control group. The experimental group received cognitive behavioral analysis psychotherapy sessions, but the control group did not receive any intervention during this period. To collect data, a structured clinical interview for axis one disorders, the Love Trauma Syndrome Questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory, the Second Edition, the Forgiveness Scale, and the subjective pain questionnaire were used. The subjects answered the questionnaires in three stages: pre-test, post-test, and three-month follow-up. The data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance. The results showed that cognitive behavioral psychotherapy had a significant effect on subjective pain and forgiveness at the post-test stage, and these changes were maintained at the three-month follow-up. This treatment method can be used to enhance the emotional health of women with depression and romantic relationship breakup.
&lt;strong&gt;Introduction&lt;/strong&gt;
Love trauma syndrome is introduced as a stressful event that can aggravate the symptoms of emotional disorders. Rosse (2007) has introduced the syndrome of love trauma syndromes as a set of symptoms that appear after the collapse of a romantic relationship. The syndrome disrupts the individual&#039;s functioning, leads to maladaptive responses, and includes four features: arousal; avoidance and automatic reminders; and emotional indifference. One of the consequences of love trauma is sensitivity to mental pain. Studies show that high sensitivity to mental pain is related to maladaptive behaviors, including unwillingness to experience and accept events. Ranter et al. (2012) believed that forgiveness is a coping strategy against negative emotions which makes people mix their previous assumptions and find a new understanding of the consequences of mistakes. The results of this research can increase the quality of interventions and preparation of treatment protocols in this field plus preventing the problems of people involved with love trauma syndromes.
Cognitive-Behavioral Analysis System of psychotherapy can be considered an effective intervention in the treatment of depression with love trauma syndrome considering that a depressive disorder requires clinical attention and considers love trauma syndrome as a triggering factor in depression.
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Methods&lt;/strong&gt;
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of cognitive behavioral analysis psychotherapy on subjective pain and forgiveness in women with depression who had experienced romantic relationship breakup. In this study a semi-experimental pretest-posttest design with a control group and a three-month follow-up was employed. The statistical population of this study consisted of all women aged 18 to 35 years with romantic relationship breakup and depression in Isfahan in 1400. Thirty subjects were selected via available sampling and were randomly assigned to two experimental and control groups. The experimental group received cognitive behavioral analysis psychotherapy sessions, but the control group did not receive any intervention during this period. To collect data, a structured clinical interview for axis one disorders, the Love Trauma Syndrome Questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory, the Second Edition, the Forgiveness Scale, and the Subjective Pain Questionnaire were used. The subjects answered the questionnaires in three stages: pretest, posttest, and three-month follow-up. The data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance.
 
 
&lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt;
The sample consisted of 30 women. The mean and standard deviation of the age of the control group and the experimental group were 26.44±5.34 and 27.38±4.63 accordingly. The mean scores of subjective pain variables, experiential avoidance, and forgiveness in two experimental (Cognitive-Behavioral Analysis System of psychotherapy) and control groups have a significant difference (&lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt;&lt;0.001). The results of the follow-up test to compare the experimental and the control groups in the research stages in the research variables show that there is a significant difference between the control group and experimental group in the post-test stages as well as the follow-up in all three variables of mental pain and forgiveness.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Discussion&lt;/strong&gt;
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Cognitive-Behavioral Analysis System of psychotherapy on mental pain and forgiveness in women suffering from comorbid depression with love trauma syndrome in Isfahan City. The available sampling method, the use of self-report tools, the lack of examination of cultural and social variables, and the implementation of research exclusively in women&#039;s society besides not paying attention to the type and quality of the lost emotional relationship were among the limitations of the research. It is suggested to use qualitative measurement tools focusing on physical and emotional symptoms in future research.
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Ethical Consideration&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Compliance with Ethical Guidelines                  &lt;/strong&gt;
Prior to the start of the research, participants were&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;made aware of the research objective. It was&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;announced to the participants that they could withdraw from the study at any time if they wished. They were also assured that their identity information would remain confidential. This research did not have any conflicts with the religious and cultural norms of the society. This research has also been approved by the Ethics Committee of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz with the ethics code Scu.ac.ir EE/99.3.02.63784/ 
&lt;strong&gt;Authors’ Contributions&lt;/strong&gt;
The first and second authors were responsible for data collection, statistical analysis, and writing the initial draft under the supervision of the advisor (the first author)             
&lt;strong&gt;Conflict of Interest&lt;/strong&gt;
In the disclosures of this article, there are no conflicts of interest among the authors   
&lt;strong&gt;Funding&lt;/strong&gt;
The present research did not receive any financial support from any organization.
&lt;strong&gt;Acknowledgment&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
The authors would like to express gratitude to all the peoples who participated in this research.
 </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">هدف از اجرای این پژوهش اثربخشی روان‌درمانی تحلیل شناختی‌-رفتاری بر درد ذهنی و بخشش زنان مبتلا به افسردگی دارای تجربۀ شکست عاطفی بود. در این پژوهش از طرح نیمه‌آزمایشی پیش‌آزمون-پس‌آزمون با گروه گواه با پیگیری سه‌ماهه استفاده شد. جامعۀ آماری این پژوهش را کلیۀ زنان دارای تجربۀ شکست عاطفی و افسردگی 18 تا 35 سالۀ شهر اصفهان در سال 1400 تشکیل دادند که از این میان، 30 آزمودنی به صورت در دسترس انتخاب و به صورت تصادفی در دو گروه آزمایش و گروه گواه جایگزین شدند. گروه‌ آزمایش جلسات روان‌درمانی تحلیل شناختی-رفتاری را دریافت کردند، اما گروه گواه در این مدت مداخله‌ای دریافت نکردند. برای جمع‌آوری اطلاعات از مصاحبۀ بالینی ساختاریافته برای اختلالات محور یک، پرسشنامۀ نشانگان ضربۀ عشق، پرسشنامۀ افسردگی بک ویرایش دوم، مقیاس بخشش و پرسشنامۀ درد ذهنی استفاده شد. آزمودنی‌ها در سه مرحلۀ پیش‌آزمون، پس‌آزمون و پیگیری سه‌ماهه به پرسشنامه‌ها پاسخ دادند. داده­ها با استفاده از روش تحلیل کوواریانس چندمتغیره تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان داد روان‌درمانی تحلیل شناختی-رفتاری بر درد ذهنی و بخشش در مرحلۀ پس‌آزمون تأثیری معنا‌داری دارد و این تغییرات در پیگیری سه‌ماهه نیز محفوظ مانده است. از این روش درمانی می‌توان برای تقویت سلامت عاطفی زنان دچار افسردگی هم‌بود با شکست عاطفی سود جست.
 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">روان‌درمانی تحلیل شناختی-رفتاری</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">درد ذهنی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">بخشش</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">افسردگی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">شکست عاطفی</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ppls.ui.ac.ir/article_30472_21d037892168a4513e3caec1efb36b5c.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه اصفهان</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>پژوهش نامه روانشناسی مثبت</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4248</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Structural Equation Modeling of Self-Control Based on Positive Childhood Experiences with the Mediating Role of Self-Compassion in Substance-Dependent Individuals</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>مدل‌یابی خودمهارگری بر اساس تجربیات مثبت دوران کودکی با نقش میانجی شفقت به خود در افراد وابسته به مواد</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>65</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>88</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">30563</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/ppls.2026.145829.2645</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>نرجس</FirstName>
					<LastName>عامری</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشجوی دکتری، گروه روانشناسی بالینی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>محمود</FirstName>
					<LastName>نجفی</LastName>
<Affiliation>: دانشیار، گروه روانشناسی بالینی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>03</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The aim of the present study was to investigate the positive relationship between positive childhood experiences and self-regulation in individuals with substance dependence undergoing methadone maintenance treatment and to determine the mediating role of self-compassion in this relationship. The research method was descriptive-correlational. A total of 312 patients with substance dependence undergoing methadone treatment who were referred to addiction treatment centers in Shahroud City were selected through purposive sampling. The instruments used in this study included the Self-Regulation Scale, the Positive Childhood Experiences Questionnaire, and the Self-Compassion Questionnaire. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the proposed model. The findings showed that positive childhood experiences have a direct and significant relationship with self-regulation, and self-compassion plays a mediating role in the relationship between positive childhood experiences and self-regulation. Overall, the results indicated that the model has a good fit. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of self-compassion interventions in improving addiction. Self-compassion is associated with self-regulation and acts as a protective factor in managing challenges related to substance use disorders. Incorporating self-compassion-focused interventions into rehabilitation programs can enhance self-regulation and promote recovery outcomes in various populations.
&lt;strong&gt;Introduction&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;sup&gt;*&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
Substance use is a concerning global health challenge. Numerous therapeutic approaches have been developed to terminate psychological and physical dependence on drugs. Methadone maintenance treatment is one of the essential evidence-based treatments for opioid dependence (Bakhshani et al., 2022). Among psychological disorders, addiction is the most prominent example of a self-regulation deficit (Kräplin et al., 2024). Therefore, examining factors that can contribute to self-regulation is of great importance. Recent studies in positive psychology emphasize that the absence of negative emotions is not enough for well-being. Positive emotions must also be experienced at adequate levels for personal growth (Doğan &amp; Eren Yavuz., 2020). Childhood-related factors are increasingly investigated to understand how pathways to substance dependence begin (Kim et al., 2024). Various studies have described risk and protective factors for self-regulation in substance use. However, limited information is available about the processes that mediate these associations. Understanding the mechanisms behind these associations is essential for identifying how positive childhood experiences influence self-regulation. In this context, self-compassion has emerged as a transformative psychological construct capable of addressing these gaps. It appears to be associated with self-regulation and can also be a consequence of positive childhood experiences. Despite strong theoretical relationships among positive childhood experiences, self-compassion, and self-regulation, few studies have examined these variables together in a unified causal framework, particularly among individuals with substance dependence. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the causal relationships between positive childhood experiences and self-regulation, with an emphasis on the mediating role of self-compassion among individuals with substance dependence undergoing methadone maintenance treatment.
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Method&lt;/strong&gt;
The present study employed a correlational method using structural equation modeling. The statistical population of this study consisted of all patients with substance dependence undergoing methadone maintenance treatment who were referred to addiction treatment centers in Shahroud City, Iran, in 2024. A purposive sampling method was applied, resulting in a final sample of 312 participants.
Data collection was conducted using three standardized self-report instruments: The Self-Control Scale, which assesses the individual&#039;s ability to control impulses, resist temptations, focus on tasks, establish healthy habits, and maintain moderation in behavior; the Positive Childhood Experiences Scale, which measures the individual&#039;s positive emotional memories and experiences during childhood; and the Self-Compassion Questionnaire, which evaluates the extent of self-kindness, self-judgment, mindfulness, over-identification, common humanity, and isolation in facing personal sufferings and failures. All instruments demonstrated acceptable reliability and construct validity in the present sample.
Participants completed the questionnaires after providing informed consent. Data screening procedures confirmed univariate normality and the absence of multicollinearity. Structural equation modeling with maximum likelihood estimation was used to test direct and indirect relationships among the variables. The mediating role of self-compassion was examined using bootstrapping procedures with confidence intervals.
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt;
The mean age of participants was 35.81 ± 4.33 years. A total of 255 participants were male (81.7%), and 57 were female (18.3%). Regarding marital status, 101 participants (32.4%) were single, and 211 participants (67.6%) were married. In terms of educational background, 261 participants (83.6%) had a high school education, and 51 participants (16.4%) had higher education. Regarding employment status, 47 participants were unemployed (15.07%), 52 were employed part-time (16.67%), and 213 were employed full-time (68.26%). Patterns of drug use indicated that 117 participants used opium, 43 used heroin, 38 used crack, 71 used methamphetamine, and 43 others used synthetic drugs.
Skewness and kurtosis values fall within acceptable ranges, confirming the normal distribution of the data. The results of the correlation matrix of research variables showed that all correlation coefficients between the variables are significant at the 0.01 level. The proposed structural model demonstrates a good fit to the data based on multiple goodness-of-fit indices (&lt;em&gt;χ&lt;/em&gt;²/df = 2.96, GFI = 0.95, CFI = 0.96, IFI = 0.96, AGFI = 0.94, NFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.079).
The results show that positive childhood experiences positively and significantly predict self-compassion (&lt;em&gt;β&lt;/em&gt; = 0.18, &lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt; &lt; 0.001), indicating that individuals who have experienced more positive emotional experiences during childhood show higher levels of self-compassion in adulthood. Positive childhood experiences also positively and significantly predict self-regulation (&lt;em&gt;β&lt;/em&gt; = 0.37, &lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt; &lt; 0.001), indicating that positive childhood memories reduce tendencies toward impulsive behaviors and weakness in self-control. Furthermore, self-compassion positively predicts self-regulation (&lt;em&gt;β &lt;/em&gt;= 0.43, &lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt; &lt; 0.001), indicating that individuals with higher levels of self-compassion show greater persistence and self-control when facing challenges.
Bootstrapping analyses confirm that self-compassion plays a significant mediating role in the relationship between positive childhood experiences and self-regulation. The indirect effect of positive childhood experiences on self-regulation through self-compassion is statistically significant (&lt;em&gt;β&lt;/em&gt; = 0.16, &lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt; &lt; 0.001). These findings indicate that positive childhood experiences influence self-regulation both directly and indirectly by increasing self-compassion.
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;
The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between positive childhood experiences and self-regulation based on the mediating role of self-compassion in individuals with substance dependence undergoing methadone maintenance treatment. The findings showed that positive childhood experiences directly increase self-regulation in individuals with substance dependence; in such a way that positive emotional memories of childhood, by providing psychological infrastructures, strengthen self-regulatory capacities and reduce the internalization of unhealthy emotions, which can serve as a protective factor against substance abuse. Furthermore, the findings revealed that in addition to the direct effect, positive childhood experiences also have an indirect effect on self-regulation through self-compassion. In other words, positive childhood experiences such as joy, love, attention, and appreciation, through the internalization of parents&#039; accepting and supportive attitude, lay the groundwork for the development of self-compassion in adulthood. Self-compassion, by increasing the capacity to focus on long-term goals, resisting immediate temptations, and enhancing cognitive flexibility, helps individuals to regulate their actions in accordance with their beliefs and goals and have greater self-control. In fact, individuals who have had more positive childhood experiences, by drawing on their internal assets, make more thoughtful decisions when facing challenges and reduce impulsive actions, which in turn strengthens self-regulation. The results emphasize the importance of designing psychological and educational interventions in methadone maintenance treatment centers that focus on strengthening positive childhood experiences through reconstructing pleasant memories and increasing self-compassion through teaching skills such as self-kindness, mindfulness, and reducing self-judgment, because such interventions can effectively strengthen self-regulation in individuals with substance dependence and contribute to treatment persistence and relapse prevention.
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Ethical Consideration&lt;/strong&gt;
We strictly observed all ethical considerations during the research process. It included ensuring the confidentiality of participants&#039; identities and obtaining informed consent from all participants.
&lt;strong&gt;Authors’ Contributions&lt;/strong&gt;
All authors contributed to the preparation of the final manuscript.
&lt;strong&gt;Conflict of Interest&lt;/strong&gt;
The authors report no conflict of interest.
&lt;strong&gt;Funding&lt;/strong&gt;
The authors received no financial support for the study.
&lt;strong&gt;Acknowledgments&lt;/strong&gt;
This research is funded by Semnan University, research grant No 226 /1404/ ط 14041111.
 The authors express their gratitude to all individuals who contributed to this research.
 
*. Corresponding author</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی رابطۀ مثبت بین تجربیات مثبت دوران کودکی با خودمهارگری در افراد وابسته به مواد تحت درمان نگهدارنده با متادون و تعیین نقش میانجی شفقت به خود در این رابطه بود. روش پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. تعداد 312 نفر از بیماران وابسته به مواد تحت درمان با متادون مراجعه‌کننده به مراکز ترک اعتیاد شهر شاهرود، به شیوۀ نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای استفاده‌شده در این پژوهش شامل مقیاس خودمهارگری، پرسشنامۀ تجربیات مثبت دوران کودکی و پرسشنامۀ شفقت به خود بودند. به منظور ارزیابی الگوی پیشنهادی، از مدل معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد تجربیات مثبت دوران کودکی رابطه‌ای مستقیم و معنادار با خودمهارگری&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;دارد و شفقت به خود در رابطۀ تجربیات مثبت دوران کودکی و خودمهارگری نقش واسطه‌ای دارد. در مجموع، نتایج نشان داد مدل برازشی مطلوب دارد. این یافته‌ها، پتانسیل درمانی مداخلات مبتنی بر شفقت به خود در بهبود اعتیاد برجسته می‌شود. شفقت به خود با خودمهارگری مرتبط است و به‌ عنوان عامل محافظتی در مدیریت چالش‌های مرتبط با اختلالات مصرف مواد عمل می‌کند. گنجاندن مداخلات متمرکز بر خودشفقتی در برنامه‌های توان‌بخشی می‌تواند خودمهارگری را افزایش و نتایج بهبودی را در جمعیت‌های مختلف ارتقا دهد.
 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">افراد وابسته به مواد</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">تجربیات مثبت دوران کودکی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">خودمهارگری</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">شفقت به خود</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">متادون</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ppls.ui.ac.ir/article_30563_70fb7635c78f7f833cd7df0680ddb73e.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه اصفهان</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>پژوهش نامه روانشناسی مثبت</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4248</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Essentials and Subtleties of Wise Teaching: A Phenomenological Exploration of the Therapeutic Factors of Successful Education</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>الزامات و لطائف معلمیِ خردمندانه: کاوشی پدیدارشناختی در عوامل مؤثر بر آموزش‌وپرورش موفق</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>89</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>106</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">30715</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/ppls.2026.147428.2685</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>زهرا</FirstName>
					<LastName>فلاح مبارکه</LastName>
<Affiliation>کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی عمومی،گروه روانشناسی، دانشکدۀ روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>سمانه</FirstName>
					<LastName>اسعدی</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>زهرا</FirstName>
					<LastName>نادری نوبندگانی</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>12</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The aim of this study was to examine the behavioral characteristics of a wise teacher as a factor in successful education from the perspective of wise teachers in the city of Yazd. A qualitative phenomenological method was used. The research setting included teachers (both active and retired) in Yazd County, and the sample, based on purposive sampling, consisted of male and female teachers who were identified as wise teachers by first-year students at Yazd University. After reaching theoretical saturation, the sample was limited to eleven subjects. From semi-structured interviews with the participants (3 men and 8 women), nine subcategories and two main categories were extracted. The categories related to the requirements of wise teaching included having interest and work commitment with a sacred purpose, being punctual/time-aware, the teachers’ having academic-pedagogical care, students’ enjoying emotional-psychological care, and striving to acquire, use, and transmit teaching experiences. The main category of the subtleties of wise teaching included attention to the enduring impacts of a teacher, careful reflection on actions and reactions, the importance of students’ first impressions (especially a neat appearance), and the formation of positive developments in students. According to the teachers’ views, to raise a wise generation, teachers must be equipped with a set of wise behavioral traits and, by observing particular subtleties in their conduct, cultivate wisdom in students—wisdom that is recognized as one of the factors effective in successful education.&lt;strong&gt;  &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Keywords:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; wisdom, teacher, student, phenomenology
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Introduction&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;sup&gt;*&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
Education is a fundamental social institution that plays a pivotal role in sustainable development by shaping individuals&#039; personal, social, and intellectual growth. Rapid technological and societal changes have increased the need to rethink educational practices, particularly the competencies and responsibilities of teachers (Darling-Hammond et al., 2017). Among these competencies, wisdom has emerged as a crucial educational attribute. Defined as the integration of deep knowledge, life experience, moral judgment, and practical decision-making, wisdom enables individuals to pursue personal and collective well-being (Glück et al., 2019). Although wisdom is primarily cultivated through experience and reflection, research indicates that it can also be fostered through formal education (Bruya &amp; Ardelt, 2018). However, a persistent gap between educational policy and classroom practice underscores the need for evidence-based research. Recognizing the influential role of teachers in shaping students&#039; behaviors and fostering wisdom, the present study draws upon a robust body of contemporary research and established theoretical foundations to address the following research question: What are the professional requirements of a wise teacher for effectively cultivating wisdom in students?
 
&lt;strong&gt;Method&lt;/strong&gt;
This study adopted a qualitative research design using a phenomenological approach to explore teachers’ lived experiences and perceptions of wisdom and its behavioral manifestations. The research population consisted of both active and retired teachers in Yazd County, Iran. Participants were selected through purposive sampling. Initially, undergraduate students in their first to fourth semesters at the University of Yazd, who had recently graduated from their previous educational level, were asked to identify teachers they regarded as wise. Based on these nominations, semi-structured interviews were conducted until data saturation was achieved, resulting in a final sample of 11 teachers (3 men and 8 women). Data were collected through semi-structured interviews beginning with broad questions about the meaning of wisdom and its behavioral expressions, followed by more in-depth probing questions designed to elicit participants’ reflections and lived experiences. The interview data were analyzed using Colaizzi’s phenomenological method. Significant statements were first identified and assigned initial codes. Conceptually similar codes were then grouped into categories, allowing key themes that captured the essence of participants’ experiences and understandings of wisdom to emerge.
 
&lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt;
The analysis ultimately yielded nine subcategories and two main categories, namely Requirements of Wise Teaching and Subtleties of Wise Teaching. When discussing teachers’ wisdom, it is essential to examine the characteristics and dispositions that define a wise teacher. Teachers serve as influential role models for their students; therefore, wisdom must be evident in their behavior to effectively transmit it to students and nurture a wise future generation.
The categories identified under the Requirements of Wise Teaching included having interest and work commitment with a sacred purpose, being punctual/time-aware, the teachers’ having academic-pedagogical care, students’ enjoying emotional-psychological care, and striving to acquire, use, and transmit teaching experiences.
In addition to these essential requirements, the findings suggest that subtle yet important aspects of teaching can strengthen teachers’ motivation and enable them to engage more effectively and consistently in education, particularly in fostering wisdom. A wise teacher not only embodies the necessary professional and personal qualities but also attends to these finer dimensions of practice to achieve greater effectiveness. The main category of Subtleties of Wise Teaching encompassed attention to the enduring impacts of a teacher, careful reflection on actions and reactions, the importance of students’ first impressions (especially a neat appearance), and the cultivation of positive developments in students
 
&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;
Participants emphasized that teachers must first embody wisdom themselves before they can effectively cultivate it in their students. They viewed teaching as a noble profession dedicated to human development rather than merely a source of income. Accordingly, wise teachers should continuously update their knowledge and provide students with scientifically sound and relevant learning experiences.  supporting previous research highlighting the importance of continuous professional development for effective teaching (McLeod, 2020). Beyond professional competence, wise teachers were described as empathetic individuals who understand students&#039; needs. This finding is consistent with evidence showing that teacher expectations influence student outcomes through factors such as empathy and perceptual biases (Murdock &amp; Sedlacek, 2018). Participants also considered the acquisition, application, and sharing of professional experience to be indispensable elements of wisdom, reflecting the central role of experience in most theoretical conceptualizations of wisdom. The findings further identified several subtle behavioral characteristics that distinguish wise teachers from merely competent ones. They also highlighted the importance of first impressions, consistent with the findings of Rivera et al. (2023). Overall, the study suggests that promoting wisdom among future generations requires more than curriculum reform. It also depends on preparing teachers who personally exemplify wisdom. 
As this study employed a qualitative research design, its findings have limited generalizability compared with those of quantitative studies. Furthermore, because wisdom is strongly shaped by cultural context, the characteristics of wise teaching identified in this study may differ across societies and educational settings. Future research should therefore examine these findings in diverse cultural contexts using both qualitative and quantitative approaches. In addition, given that students are key stakeholders in the educational process, future studies should explore the behavioral characteristics of teachers who foster wisdom from students&#039; perspectives.
 
&lt;strong&gt;Ethical Consideration&lt;/strong&gt;
All ethical principles regarding human subjects were strictly observed&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Compliance with Ethical Guidelines&lt;/strong&gt;
All ethical principles involving human participants were observed in this study. Participation was voluntary, informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the confidentiality and anonymity of the collected data were ensured
&lt;strong&gt;Authors&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;’&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; Contributions&lt;/strong&gt;
This study was conducted as part of the first author’s Master’s thesis at Yazd University. The first author conducted the study and drafted the manuscript. The second author served as the supervisor and corresponding author. The third author acted as the advisor. All authors approved the final manuscript.
&lt;strong&gt;Conflict of Interest&lt;/strong&gt;
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest
&lt;strong&gt;Funding&lt;/strong&gt;
This research received no external funding.
&lt;strong&gt;Acknowledgment&lt;/strong&gt;
We gratefully acknowledge all those who supported us in carrying out this research
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
 
*. Corresponding author</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">هدف از این پژوهش بررسی ویژگی‌های رفتاری معلم خردمند به عنوان عاملی در آموزش‌وپرورش موفق از نگاه معلمان خردمند شهرستان یزد بوده و برای مطالعه از روش کیفی پدیدارشناختی استفاده شده است. محیط پژوهش شامل معلمان شهرستان یزد (شاغل و بازنشسته) بود و حجم نمونه، بر اساس نمونه گیری هدفمند، معلمان زن و مردی بودند که توسط 60 دانشجوی سال‌اولی دانشگاه یزد به عنوان معلم خردمند معرفی شدند و بعد از رسیدن به اشباع نظری به یازده نفر محدود شد. در مجموع، از مصاحبۀ نیمه‌ساختارمند با مشارکت‌کنندگان (3 مرد و 8 زن)، 9 مقولۀ فرعی و 2 مقولۀ اصلی استخراج شدند. مقوله­های استخراج‌شده در رابطه با الزامات معلمی خردمندانه شامل داشتن علاقه و تعهد کاری با هدفی مقدس، زمان‌شناس‌بودن، وجود مراقبت‌های علمی-آموزشی معلم، وجود مراقبت‌های عاطفی-روانی از دانش‌آموزان، تلاش برای کسب، استفاده و انتقال تجربیات معلمی و مقولۀ اصلی لطائف معلمی خردمندانه شامل توجه به تأثیر جاودانۀ معلم، تأمل دقیق بر کنش‌ها و واکنش‌ها، اهمیت‌داشتن برداشت‌های نخستین دانش‌آموزان (به ویژه ظاهر آراسته) و شکل‌گیری تحولات مثبت در دانش‌آموزان استخراج شده‌اند. با توجه به دیدگاه معلمان، برای پرورش نسلی خردمند، معلمان باید مجهز به یک‌سری ویژگی‌های رفتاری خردمندانه باشند و همچنین، با رعایت لطائفی خاص در رفتار خود، خردمندی را که به عنوان یکی از عوامل مؤثر در آموزش‌وپرورش موفق شناخته می‌شود، در دانش‌آموزان تقویت کنند.&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
 
&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">خردمندی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">معلم</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">دانش‌آموز</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">پدیدارشناسی</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ppls.ui.ac.ir/article_30715_29fc674f81bee6397e5729a56a26e8a4.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه اصفهان</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>پژوهش نامه روانشناسی مثبت</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4248</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Role of Family Communication Patterns in Psychological Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Ambiguity Tolerance and Emotional Self-Disclosure in Adults</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>نقش الگوهای ارتباطی خانواده بر بهزیستی روان‌شناختی با میانجی‌گری تحمل ابهام و خودافشایی هیجانی در بزرگسالان</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>107</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>126</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">30689</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/ppls.2026.148743.2721</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>رایحه</FirstName>
					<LastName>جلال مآب</LastName>
<Affiliation>کارشناس ارشد روان‌شناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید باهنر، کرمان، ایران</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0009-4498-1596</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>مهشید</FirstName>
					<LastName>تجربه کار</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشیار گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید باهنر، کرمان، ایران</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-3931-8599</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>مسعود</FirstName>
					<LastName>حسین‌چاری</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشیار گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید باهنر، کرمان، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>26</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The aim of this research was to explain the psychological well-being of young adults based on family communication patterns, considering the mediating role of ambiguity tolerance and emotional self-disclosure. The participants in the research were 500 young individuals aged 18 to 35 years who were selected using convenience sampling. The participants responded to the Scales of Psychological Well-being, the Revised Family Communication Pattern instrument, the Ambiguity Tolerance Scale-II, and the Emotional Self-Disclosure Scale. The research method was structural equation modeling, and the results showed that the model had a good fit. The conversation orientation, ambiguity tolerance, and emotional self-disclosure directly and positively, whereas the conformity orientation directly and negatively, predicted the psychological well-being of young adults. Furthermore, conversation orientation indirectly and positively, and conformity orientation indirectly and negatively through ambiguity tolerance and emotional self-disclosure, predicted psychological well-being. Overall, this research confirms the role of family communication patterns, mediated by ambiguity tolerance and emotional self-disclosure in the psychological well-being of young adults. The conclusion is that the attention to choosing the right communication pattern by parents, by influencing the ability to tolerate ambiguity and emotional self-disclosure, can be effective in improving and promoting the psychological well-being of young adults.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mental health is a multi-dimensional construct, with psychological well-being as a crucial component. Positive psychology emphasizes the study and promotion of positive factors such as happiness, hope, resilience, optimism, and psychological well-being (Compton &amp; Hoffman, 2019). Psychological well-being is defined as a multi-faceted concept encompassing self-acceptance, positive relationships with others, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth (Ryff &amp; Singer, 1998). Given the widespread biological, psychological, and social changes occurring during young adults, identifying factors that influence the psychological well-being of this significant population is vital (Bahari &amp; Farkish, 2009). The family environment and the quality of its relationships are among the most important factors, as the family is the initial context for growth and serves as the foundation for personality, values, and beliefs (Kamijani &amp; Maher, 2007). The family communication patterns model emphasizes two dimensions: conversation orientation and conformity orientation (Koerner &amp; Fitzpatrick, 2002). This study aimed to explain the psychological well-being of young adults based on these patterns, with the mediating role of ambiguity tolerance and emotional self-disclosure, testing several hypotheses related to direct and indirect effects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Method&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The study employed a descriptive-correlational design using structural equation modeling. The target population was all adults aged 18 to 35 in Kerman in 2024. Based on Kline&#039;s criteria and the proposed model, a sample of 500 was chosen via convenience sampling. After removing incomplete questionnaires, 435 participants remained (290 female, 145 male, 123 married, 71.4% with a bachelor&#039;s degree). The following measurement tools were used: Ryff&#039;s Psychological Well-being Scale (54 items), the Revised Family Communication Pattern (RFCP) instrument (26 items), the Ambiguity Tolerance Scale-II (MSTAT-II) (13 items), and the Emotional Self-Disclosure Scale (ESDS) (40 items). Reliability was confirmed with Cronbach&#039;s alpha values, which for psychological well-being was 0.86, RFCP was 0.81, MSTAT-II was 0.86, and ESDS was 0.89. Questionnaires were distributed with ethical considerations like confidentiality and informed consent. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics using SPSS 20 and structural equation modeling using LISREL to examine direct and indirect effects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As shown in Table 1, correlation coefficients between demographic variables (age, gender, and marital status) and the primary study variables were extremely weak, ranging from  to , with coefficients of determination ( ) not exceeding . This indicates that demographic variables accounted for less than 1% of the variance in the outcome variables. Consequently, demographic variables were excluded as controls in the path analysis model.&lt;br /&gt;After verifying the underlying assumptions of structural equation modeling (SEM), the conceptual model’s goodness-of-fit indices were evaluated (Table 2). The model demonstrated an acceptable fit to the empirical data ( , , , , , , , , , ), satisfying established fit criteria.&lt;br /&gt;Path analysis revealed that all direct paths within the structural model were statistically significant (Figure 1). Specifically, direct paths to psychological well-being were significant for conversation orientation ( ), conformity orientation ( ), tolerance of ambiguity ( ), and emotional self-disclosure ( ). Furthermore, conversation orientation directly affected emotional self-disclosure ( ) and tolerance of ambiguity ( ). Conformity orientation also exhibited significant direct effects on emotional self-disclosure ( ) and tolerance of ambiguity ( ).&lt;br /&gt;To evaluate the mediation hypotheses, bootstrapping procedures with 5,000 resamples were performed at a 95% confidence level (Table 3). The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all tested indirect pathways excluded zero, confirming statistically significant indirect effects. In summary, both tolerance of ambiguity and emotional self-disclosure served as significant partial mediators in the structural pathways linking family communication patterns to psychological well-being.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Table 1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Correlations Between Demographic Variables and Dependent Variables&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Demographic Variable&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Psychological&lt;br /&gt;Well-Being&lt;br /&gt;(Total Score)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Family Communication&lt;br /&gt;Pattern&lt;br /&gt;(Total Score)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tolerance of&lt;br /&gt;Ambiguity&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Emotional&lt;br /&gt;Self-Disclosure&lt;br /&gt;(Total Score)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Age&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.07&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.05&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.09&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.04&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gender (Female, Male)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.06&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.08&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.03&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.07&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Marital Status (Married, Single)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.04&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.02&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.06&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.05&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Table 2&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fit Indices for the Conceptual Model&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Model&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;χ²&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;df&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;χ²/df&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;RMSEA&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;GFI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;IFI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NFI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;AGFI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CFI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conceptual Model&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3129.16&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1166&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2.68&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.002&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.062&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.94&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.95&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.91&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.86&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.94&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Figure 1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Tested Path Analysis of the Research Model&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;C&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;o&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;n&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;v&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;e&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;r&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;s&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;a&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;t&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;i&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;o&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;n&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;O&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;r&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;i&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;e&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;n&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;t&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;a&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;t&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;i&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;o&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;n&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;C&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;o&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;n&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;f&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;o&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;r&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;m&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;i&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;t&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;y&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;O&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;r&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;i&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;e&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;n&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;t&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;a&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;t&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;i&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;o&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;n&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;T&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;o&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;l&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;e&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;r&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;a&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;n&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;c&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;e&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;o&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;f&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;m&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;b&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;i&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;g&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;u&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;i&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;t&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;y&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;9&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;9&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;E&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;m&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;o&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;t&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;i&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;o&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;n&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;a&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;l&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;S&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;e&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;l&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;f&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;-&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;D&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;i&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;s&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;c&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;l&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;o&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;s&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;u&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;r&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;e&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;8&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;P&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;s&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;y&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;c&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;h&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;o&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;l&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;o&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;g&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;i&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;c&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;a&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;l&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;W&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;e&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;l&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;l&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;-&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;B&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;e&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;i&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;n&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;g&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;9&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;5&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;3&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;4&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;8&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;-&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;-&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;9&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;9&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;4&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Table 3                                                  &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bootstrap Results for Indirect Paths in the Proposed Model&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Indirect Path&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Data&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boot&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bias&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;SE&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lower 95% CI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Upper 95% CI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Result&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conversation Orientation → Tolerance of Ambiguity → Psychological Well-Being&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.0595&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.0156&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.0713&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.0132&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.0299&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.0918&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Significant&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conversation Orientation → Emotional Self-Disclosure → Psychological Well-Being&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.0570&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.0148&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.0316&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.0136&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.0296&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.0877&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Significant&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conformity Orientation → Tolerance of Ambiguity → Psychological Well-Being&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.0185&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.0075&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.0593&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.0132&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.0358&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.0063&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Significant&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conformity Orientation → Emotional Self-Disclosure → Psychological Well-Being&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.0171&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.0068&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.0263&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.0129&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.0335&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-.0063&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Significant&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The study confirms that ambiguity tolerance and emotional self-disclosure partially mediate the relationship between family communication patterns and young adults&#039; psychological well-being. Conversation orientation in families, through high levels of discussion and self-expression, fosters higher levels of ambiguity tolerance and emotional self-disclosure, leading to enhanced psychological well-being (Ryff, 1995). High conversation orientation provides a supportive atmosphere, teaching children multi-faceted problem-solving and critical thinking, which increases their sense of mastery over complex situations (Fitzpatrick &amp; Koerner, 2005). Conversely, high conformity orientation, by limiting choices and self-expression, decreases ambiguity tolerance and emotional self-disclosure, weakening psychological well-being. These findings underline the importance of parental choices in communication patterns for improving young adults’ psychological well-being (Reinecke &amp; Trepte, 2014). Limitations include not controlling for socio-economic status and the convenience sampling method, which limits generalizability (Habibpour Gotabi, 2022). Future research should consider environmental factors, the role of peers, and qualitative or mixed-methods approaches for deeper insights, including other family aspects like parenting styles and attachment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Compliance with Ethical Guidelines&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were conducted in accordance with ethical standards, ensuring informed consent, voluntary participation, and the complete confidentiality and anonymity of all respondents.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Authors’ Contributions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The authors collaboratively contributed to the conceptualization, data collection, statistical analysis, and drafting of this research article.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conflict of Interest&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and publication of this article.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Funding&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Acknowledgment&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The authors express their sincere appreciation to all the participants whose cooperation and time made this study possible&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;*. Corresponding author</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;هدف از این پژوهش تبیین بهزیستی روان‌شناختی جوانان بر اساس الگوهای ارتباطی خانواده، با در نظر گرفتن نقش واسطه‌ای تحمل ابهام و خودافشایی هیجانی بود. شرکت‌کنندگان در پژوهش جوانان 18 تا 35 سالۀ شهر کرمان بودند که به شیوۀ نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند و به مقیاس‌های بهزیستی روان‌شناختی، ابزار تجدیدنظرشدۀ الگوی ارتباطات خانواده، مقیاس تحمل ابهام نسخۀ دوم و مقیاس خودافشایی هیجانی پاسخ دادند. روش این پژوهش مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری بود که نتایج آن نشان داد مدل از برازشی مناسب برخوردار است و جهت‌گیری گفت‌و‌شنود، تحمل ابهام و خودافشایی هیجانی به طور مستقیم و مثبت، و جهت‌گیری هم‌نوایی به طور مستقیم و منفی، بهزیستی روان‌شناختی جوانان را پیش‌بینی می‌کنند. علاوه بر این، جهت‌گیری گفت‌و‌شنود به طور غیرمستقیم و مثبت و جهت‌گیری هم‌نوایی به طور غیرمستقیم و منفی از طریق تحمل ابهام و خودافشایی هیجانی، بهزیستی روان‌شناختی را پیش‌بینی می‌کند. در مجموع، این پژوهش نقش الگوهای ارتباطی خانواده را با واسطه‌گری تحمل ابهام و خودافشایی هیجانی در بهزیستی روان‌شناختی جوانان تأیید می‌کند. نتیجه اینکه اهتمام به انتخاب الگوی ارتباطی درست توسط والدین با تأثیر بر قدرت تحمل ابهام و خودافشایی هیجانی می‌تواند بر بهبود و ارتقای بهزیستی روان‌شناختی جوانان اثرگذار باشد.&lt;br /&gt; </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">بهزیستی روان‌شناختی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">الگوهای ارتباطی خانواده</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">تحمل ابهام</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">خودافشایی هیجانی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">بزرگسالان</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ppls.ui.ac.ir/article_30689_26dedb1ce46c4db4b26c9c92270a67d1.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
